Later the same day

By way of dark epilogue to the letter I posted here this morning, which seemed the very essence of clarity and sanity, I get the sense tonight that we've sleepwalked into the abyss. A sense compounded by finally - without thinking of any connection - settling down on a rare evening home alone to watch Luis Buñuel's The Exterminating Angel, which I've had sitting around ready to view since I saw Adès's opera on the subject in Salzburg.

And what do I see (what did I know I was going to see, without making the connection to begin with)? A group of well-heeled people - some sophisticated, some not - unable to leave a dinner-party for no apparent reason. Wearing themselves out and in some cases succumbing to death because of some inexplicable paralysis.

And then I think of the somnambulistic act of self harm in the Commons tonight and have to suspend viewing. Only 20 per cent of the Labour Party willing to stave off the biggest disaster the UK has faced in my lifetime? Once again, please note Andy Slaughter's observation in the previous post that this was 'the final chance to influence not just whether but on what terms the UK left the EU' And next I see that the insane American cabinet is making ultimatums to Iran that could lead to war in no time. We knew it in principle, but THERE IS NO DIPLOMACY in the White House. Sorry, but unless it's stopped, we're all f****d by this. (One brief, bitter laugh on the subject: did you know that primeval slime Steve Bannon once wanted to make a film of Shakespeare's Titus Andronicus set in outer space? What terrible thing happened to that creature and at what point in his life?)

How could it all have got so far? Is this the end? Time to go and sleep on it. It's just all too much right now. Tired of trying to rationalise it and to argue with the opposition - strangers, not friends. Withdrawal is once again the only option for keeping one's balance. However long it takes. Even clear and brilliant speakers like Ken Clarke talk of plunging down the rabbit hole. Well, let's leave his 17 minute speech here as a last throw of sanity. And then tomorrow is another day.

In the meantime, any wise or helpful words anyone else may have to offer on the subject - usually an invitation to silence - would be very welcome.

Update (2/2) - the next morning  Amazing what a good night's sleep can do. But I need to take my own advice, limit the time on LinkedIn, get more exercise (not easy when the weather's so dull and/or wet). Good quotation about self-preservation being part of the fight from Audre Lord among the ones here. And good ol' Peanuts has a fine philosophy too:

Andy Slaughter MP: doing the right thing

In the latest excellent edition of The New European (read online, or - better still - subscribe!), there was an article about 'the 25 MPs sitting on Brexit's faultline' who had not yet stuck their necks out in the forthcoming Commons vote on Article 50. I had already noted that our superlative local MP Andy Slaughter, the very model of a tireless worker for his constituency, was not on the list of Labour rebels; I wrote to him. I first got a 'wait and see' reply, but then, two days ago, the following.

As it is a public declaration, I'm sure it is fine to quote in full (I did ask, but no reply yet, and today's the day). His responses are always nuanced. And let's hope more folk on both the Labour and Conservative sides follow suit. I'm not that hopeful, but a united Europe is our only refuge at the moment as an open book, not a fortress, and I trust May's recent ill-timed opportunism will have left her rather more isolated.

Dear Mr Nice,

RE: Why I am voting against triggering Article 50 in the House of Commons

Thank you for your e-mail regarding the upcoming vote in Parliament on triggering Article 50.

I am a passionate pro-European, who worked hard for the Remain campaign last summer and still believes our prosperity, security, culture and values will be strengthened by close relations with the rest of Europe, including through membership of the EU.

70% of the voters of Hammersmith voted to Remain.  I have always thought my first loyalty is to my constituents and thousands have lobbied me to vote against the trigger.  I also represent – though they could not vote in the Referendum or General Election – the 15% of Hammersmith residents who are citizens of other EU states and who are being shamefully held as ransom by Theresa May’s Government.

The Referendum result was close – we should not ignore the 48% who voted Remain any more than the 52% who voted to Leave.  Just as Governments – and MPs – represent everyone, not just those who voted them in, so we should now be trying to find a way forward that (almost) everyone can live with.

But none of these is the reason I will be voting against triggering Article 50.

Yes, the Referendum was a deeply flawed process with a narrow victory for one side, whose promises – most infamously the £350 million a week for the NHS – were abandoned as soon as the result came in. But no election is perfect, and issues of misrepresentation, turnout and size of mandate are often prayed in aid by the losing side.

The Supreme Court was right to give the decision on starting the exit process to Parliament rather than let Theresa May – herself unelected as PM – use medieval prerogative powers to make herself the sole arbiter.  But Parliament must have primary regard to the result of the referendum, the purpose of which was to express the view of the British people on our membership of the EU.

What has convinced me to vote against the trigger was the decision by Theresa May in her speech two weeks ago, repeated and expanded on since, that this would be not only the first but the final chance to influence not just whether but on what terms the UK left the EU.

I raised this issue with Theresa May at PMQs last week and her answer made it clear that she was not interested in consulting either Parliament or the British people on the final Brexit deal.

We are being asked to accept whatever deal Theresa May negotiates, with no alternative – except no deal at all.  We cannot say, sorry that is a terrible deal, go back and try again.  Or, as a final step, if she really is incapable of safeguarding our future, putting the decision on whether to go through with Brexit back to the electorate.

This is not about re-running the Referendum of last June, it is about giving Parliament or the people a say in the future of the country.  It is the least we deserve.  Anything else is not just arrogant it is fundamentally undemocratic.

Forces on the right of politics, in the Conservative Party as well as UKIP and the far right, have long dreamed of rolling back the welfare state, employment rights and even the NHS. They also have a barely disguised distaste for the inclusive, tolerant and diverse society that places like Hammersmith and Shepherds Bush, indeed most of London, represent. 

These are not easy decisions and the arguments do not all run one way.  When we debate the amendments to the Government’s plans next week I will support those that give a real choice at the end of the process and I will make my decision on future votes depending on any concessions the Government makes.  Sadly, as I write, Theresa May looks like she has surrendered to Farage just as she shamefully did to Trump on the refugee ban.

Yours sincerely, 

Andy Slaughter

Labour MP for Hammersmith